Home/Case Law/TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA

Filed: Oct 23, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ9162432

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision that awarded lien claims for psychiatric treatment. The defendant argues that Labor Code section 3208.3(d) bars these claims due to insufficient employment duration and that the prior WCAB opinion is res judicata. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The WCAB clarified that while psychiatric conditions may be claimed as compensable consequence injuries post-January 1, 2013, they do not increase permanent impairment ratings, and the six-month employment requirement under section 3208.3(d) still applies unless the treatment was essential for a physical injury.

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision that awarded lien claims for psychiatric treatment. The defendant argues that Labor Code section 3208.3(d) bars these claims due to insufficient employment duration and that the prior WCAB opinion is res judicata. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The WCAB clarified that while psychiatric conditions may be claimed as compensable consequence injuries post-January 1, 2013, they do not increase permanent impairment ratings, and the six-month employment requirement under section 3208.3(d) still applies unless the treatment was essential for a physical injury.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA Case Analysis

TEODORO LARIOS vs. EASTBAY EQUITIES, INC. dba WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.