Home/Case Law/TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 08, 2018
Oxnard
ADJ6854571

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in max four sentences: The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, overturning the WCJ's apportionment of permanent disability. The Board found that the applicant's industrial psyche injury aggravated Parkinson's disease, causing brain injury and permanent mental incapacity. This condition conclusively presumes total permanent disability under Labor Code section 4662(a)(4), precluding apportionment. Therefore, the applicant is found totally permanently disabled without apportionment.

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Oxnard. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oxnard.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in max four sentences:

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, overturning the WCJ's apportionment of permanent disability. The Board found that the applicant's industrial psyche injury aggravated Parkinson's disease, causing brain injury and permanent mental incapacity. This condition conclusively presumes total permanent disability under Labor Code section 4662(a)(4), precluding apportionment. Therefore, the applicant is found totally permanently disabled without apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Oxnard. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Oxnard. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

TED HIRSCHBERGER vs. STOCKWELL HARRIS WOOLVERTON AND MUEHL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oxnard. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.