Home/Case Law/SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: Dec 24, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ4292283 (SRO 0134365)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to re-evaluate an interim attorney's fee awarded in a permanent total disability case. Initially, the WCJ awarded $49,286.16, but the applicant's attorney argued it was unreasonably low and should account for Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs). The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision, finding the attorney entitled to a 15% fee on the commuted present value of the lifetime award, including COLAs. This revised fee, calculated with a 3% COLA effective January 1, 2008, totals $94,985.91, commuted using the uniformly increasing reduction method.

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to re-evaluate an interim attorney's fee awarded in a permanent total disability case. Initially, the WCJ awarded $49,286.16, but the applicant's attorney argued it was unreasonably low and should account for Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs). The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision, finding the attorney entitled to a 15% fee on the commuted present value of the lifetime award, including COLAs. This revised fee, calculated with a 3% COLA effective January 1, 2008, totals $94,985.91, commuted using the "uniformly increasing reduction method."

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured Case Analysis

SYLVIA MILES vs. WAL-MART, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.