CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed late, two days after the statutory deadline. The Board noted clerical errors in the original award regarding vocational rehabilitation benefit dates and rates, which it corrected despite the dismissal of the reconsideration petition. The corrected award specifies vocational rehabilitation benefits from November 20, 2002, to November 2, 2007, with specific weekly rates for different periods within that timeframe.
SUZETTE LADAY vs. COUNTY OF LA/DEPT. OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, administered by ACCLAMATION INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed late, two days after the statutory deadline. The Board noted clerical errors in the original award regarding vocational rehabilitation benefit dates and rates, which it corrected despite the dismissal of the reconsideration petition. The corrected award specifies vocational rehabilitation benefits from November 20, 2002, to November 2, 2007, with specific weekly rates for different periods within that timeframe.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.