CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted removal to amend a WCJ's decision, specifically deleting a finding that excluded PQME Dr. Amster's evidence. CIGA sought removal arguing the exclusion of Dr. Amster's reports, which supported its claim of a later cumulative trauma injury, caused prejudice. The Board found Dr. Amster was improperly selected as PQME due to CIGA's procedural errors but affirmed the need for further development of the medical record through Dr. Abelow's supplemental report. While granting removal to correct the exclusion of Amster, the Board affirmed the rest of the WCJ's F&O.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted removal to amend a WCJ's decision, specifically deleting a finding that excluded PQME Dr. Amster's evidence. CIGA sought removal arguing the exclusion of Dr. Amster's reports, which supported its claim of a later cumulative trauma injury, caused prejudice. The Board found Dr. Amster was improperly selected as PQME due to CIGA's procedural errors but affirmed the need for further development of the medical record through Dr. Abelow's supplemental report. While granting removal to correct the exclusion of Amster, the Board affirmed the rest of the WCJ's F&O.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.