Home/Case Law/SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Filed: Feb 25, 2010
ADJ3374876 (SJO 0268303)

CompFox AI Summary

In this case, the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) sought to compel the applicant to use the same Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) from her original workers' compensation claim for her SIBTF claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's order allowing the applicant to obtain new medical-legal evaluations for her SIBTF claim with a different physician, independent of the original AME. The Board determined that the discovery procedures for workers' compensation claims, as outlined in Labor Code section 4062.2, do not apply to SIBTF claims due to their distinct legal issues. Therefore, SIBTF is responsible for reasonable costs of these independent evaluations, ensuring due process for developing evidence specific to the SIBTF claim.

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this case, the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) sought to compel the applicant to use the same Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) from her original workers' compensation claim for her SIBTF claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's order allowing the applicant to obtain new medical-legal evaluations for her SIBTF claim with a different physician, independent of the original AME. The Board determined that the discovery procedures for workers' compensation claims, as outlined in Labor Code section 4062.2, do not apply to SIBTF claims due to their distinct legal issues. Therefore, SIBTF is responsible for reasonable costs of these independent evaluations, ensuring due process for developing evidence specific to the SIBTF claim.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND Case Analysis

SUSAN MOYERS vs. COUNCIL ON AGING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.