Home/Case Law/SUSAN FOUST vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Self Insured, Adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration and Removal

SUSAN FOUST vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Self Insured, Adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jan 25, 2008
SAC 257957

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a dispute over authorization for spinal surgery. The defendant employer denied the applicant's treating physician's request for surgery based on utilization review and claimed the applicant's objection was untimely. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order compelling the parties to obtain a second opinion was interlocutory, not a final order. The WCAB also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of significant prejudice or irreparable harm.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a dispute over authorization for spinal surgery. The defendant employer denied the applicant's treating physician's request for surgery based on utilization review and claimed the applicant's objection was untimely. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order compelling the parties to obtain a second opinion was interlocutory, not a final order. The WCAB also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of significant prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SUSAN FOUST vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Self Insured, Adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2008) – | CompFox