CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's award of interpreter fees for medical treatment appointments, finding the defendant liable despite contentions of non-liability under AD Rule 9795.3. However, the issue of attorney's fees under Labor Code section 4607 was deferred pending a Supreme Court decision on a similar case concerning enforcement of medical awards. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings on attorney's fees after the Supreme Court ruling.
SURRINDER DOSANJH vs. METRO MAILING SERVICE, BROADSPIRE, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's award of interpreter fees for medical treatment appointments, finding the defendant liable despite contentions of non-liability under AD Rule 9795.3. However, the issue of attorney's fees under Labor Code section 4607 was deferred pending a Supreme Court decision on a similar case concerning enforcement of medical awards. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings on attorney's fees after the Supreme Court ruling.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.