Home/Case Law/SUMUDU JAYASURIYA vs. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SUMUDU JAYASURIYA vs. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

Filed: Apr 20, 2020
Oakland
ADJ10440533

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the original Findings and Award due to insufficient substantial evidence. The WCAB found that the chiropractor QME's reports did not adequately explain the basis for combining wrist range of motion impairment with grip strength impairment, particularly in relation to the AMA Guides. The case is returned to the WCJ for further development of the record, likely through an evaluation by an orthopedic hand specialist, to properly assess the applicant's permanent disability.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the original Findings and Award due to insufficient substantial evidence. The WCAB found that the chiropractor QME's reports did not adequately explain the basis for combining wrist range of motion impairment with grip strength impairment, particularly in relation to the AMA Guides. The case is returned to the WCJ for further development of the record, likely through an evaluation by an orthopedic hand specialist, to properly assess the applicant's permanent disability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SUMUDU JAYASURIYA vs. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT (2020) – Oakland | CompFox