Home/Case Law/Sultan McCullough vs. Cleveland Browns, et al.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Sultan McCullough vs. Cleveland Browns, et al.

Filed: Jan 18, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ7198621

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Cleveland Browns' petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Browns failed to file their petition within the 25-day deadline applicable to their California-based attorneys after the initial award was issued on December 19, 2011. Although the petition was untimely, the WCAB indicated that it would have been denied on the merits as well. The WCAB found sufficient evidence to establish subject matter jurisdiction, concluding that applicant Sultan McCullough likely signed his contract in California, his home address.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Cleveland Browns' petition for reconsideration as untimely. The Browns failed to file their petition within the 25-day deadline applicable to their California-based attorneys after the initial award was issued on December 19, 2011. Although the petition was untimely, the WCAB indicated that it would have been denied on the merits as well. The WCAB found sufficient evidence to establish subject matter jurisdiction, concluding that applicant Sultan McCullough likely signed his contract in California, his home address.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.