Home/Case Law/SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation

Filed: Jan 31, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ4634668 (FRE 0169001)

CompFox AI Summary

The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release agreement between the applicant and State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). CIGA argued its due process rights were violated as it wasn't properly notified of the 2006 order. The Appeals Board found the 2006 order did not affect CIGA's right to seek reimbursement from SCIF, as CIGA's claim arises from insurance code provisions, not the prior agreement. The Board affirmed the 2006 order and returned the case to the trial level to determine CIGA's reimbursement claim against SCIF.

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release agreement between the applicant and State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). CIGA argued its due process rights were violated as it wasn't properly notified of the 2006 order. The Appeals Board found the 2006 order did not affect CIGA's right to seek reimbursement from SCIF, as CIGA's claim arises from insurance code provisions, not the prior agreement. The Board affirmed the 2006 order and returned the case to the trial level to determine CIGA's reimbursement claim against SCIF.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation Case Analysis

SUE JORDAN vs. ANDERSON CLAYTON & CO. (COALINGA FEED YARD), STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for FREMONT INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.