Home/Case Law/STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO
Regular DecisionOpinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO

Filed: May 02, 2025
Sacramento
ADJ12511510

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant, Security Contractor Services Inc. and Travelers Sacramento, sought reconsideration of a Findings and Award which found that applicant Steven Tofanelli sustained a right ear injury causing 43% permanent disability without apportionment. Defendant contended the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) erred by not finding apportionment, arguing that Dr. Ronald Ward's medical opinion constituted substantial evidence. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, concluding that Dr. Ward's opinion on apportionment lacked substantial medical evidence as it failed to adequately explain how or why 98% of the applicant's total hearing loss was due to congenital factors versus the industrial head injury, and did not properly distinguish between apportionment of causation and disability. A final decision after reconsideration has been deferred pending further review.

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant, Security Contractor Services Inc. and Travelers Sacramento, sought reconsideration of a Findings and Award which found that applicant Steven Tofanelli sustained a right ear injury causing 43% permanent disability without apportionment. Defendant contended the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) erred by not finding apportionment, arguing that Dr. Ronald Ward's medical opinion constituted substantial evidence. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, concluding that Dr. Ward's opinion on apportionment lacked substantial medical evidence as it failed to adequately explain how or why 98% of the applicant's total hearing loss was due to congenital factors versus the industrial head injury, and did not properly distinguish between apportionment of causation and disability. A final decision after reconsideration has been deferred pending further review.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO workers compensation case in Sacramento. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO case law summary from Sacramento. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO Case Analysis

STEVEN TOFANELLI vs. SECURITY CONTRACTOR SERVICES INC.; TRAVELERS SACRAMENTO is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Sacramento. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.