CompFox AI Summary
The defendant seeks removal of an order changing venue from Oakland to Sacramento. The judge recommends denying removal, finding venue in Sacramento appropriate due to the applicant and his attorney residing there. The judge notes that Oakland is inconvenient for all parties and suggests Fresno venue could be reconsidered if psychiatric claims require litigation.
STEVEN PLESHA vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The defendant seeks removal of an order changing venue from Oakland to Sacramento. The judge recommends denying removal, finding venue in Sacramento appropriate due to the applicant and his attorney residing there. The judge notes that Oakland is inconvenient for all parties and suggests Fresno venue could be reconsidered if psychiatric claims require litigation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.