CompFox AI Summary
In Steven King v. State of California, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's award finding 61% permanent disability, including new psychiatric disability. The prior stipulated award in 2010 found 23% permanent disability for wrist and shoulder injuries. The defendant argued the WCJ erred by relying on unsubstantial medical evidence and including pre-award disability as new and further. Adopting the WCJ's report, the Board affirmed the 61% permanent disability finding, concluding the increased disability was properly assessed.
STEVEN KING vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Steven King v. State of California, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a WCJ's award finding 61% permanent disability, including new psychiatric disability. The prior stipulated award in 2010 found 23% permanent disability for wrist and shoulder injuries. The defendant argued the WCJ erred by relying on unsubstantial medical evidence and including pre-award disability as "new and further." Adopting the WCJ's report, the Board affirmed the 61% permanent disability finding, concluding the increased disability was properly assessed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.