Home/Case Law/STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular Decision

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Oct 31, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7624582 ADJ7986951

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's disapproval of a Compromise and Release (C&R) based on an improper waiver of Civil Code section 1542 rights. Subsequently, the parties withdrew the original C&R and entered into a new one without the problematic language. Due to this modification, the defendant withdrew its petition, rendering the matter moot. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot and returned the case to the WCJ for review of the new C&R.

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's disapproval of a Compromise and Release (C&R) based on an improper waiver of Civil Code section 1542 rights. Subsequently, the parties withdrew the original C&R and entered into a new one without the problematic language. Due to this modification, the defendant withdrew its petition, rendering the matter moot. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot and returned the case to the WCJ for review of the new C&R.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES Case Analysis

STEVE HERRERA vs. AMERICAN RED CROSS, Permissibly Self Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.