CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of the denial of his petition to reopen. The applicant sought to reopen his case for new and further disability, alleging his industrial injuries had worsened and new body parts were involved. The Board adopted the WCJ's recommendation to deny reconsideration, finding the applicant failed to establish industrial causation for his further disability. While the agreed medical evaluator (AME) acknowledged increased disability, he did not link it to the industrial injury.
STEVE CAMILLO vs. NUMMI; permissibly self-insured, adjusted by GALLAGHER BASSETT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of the denial of his petition to reopen. The applicant sought to reopen his case for new and further disability, alleging his industrial injuries had worsened and new body parts were involved. The Board adopted the WCJ's recommendation to deny reconsideration, finding the applicant failed to establish industrial causation for his further disability. While the agreed medical evaluator (AME) acknowledged increased disability, he did not link it to the industrial injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.