CompFox AI Summary
This case involved an applicant who sustained an industrial injury in 2001, leading to a stipulated award. The applicant later petitioned to reopen for new and further disability, and the WCJ found temporary total disability resuming in 2006. On reconsideration, the Board affirmed the temporary total disability finding, rejecting the employer's arguments regarding evidence and jurisdiction. The Board also corrected a clerical error in the original findings regarding the date of injury.
Stephen Patton vs. AMELCO ELECTRIC, PACIFIC EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involved an applicant who sustained an industrial injury in 2001, leading to a stipulated award. The applicant later petitioned to reopen for new and further disability, and the WCJ found temporary total disability resuming in 2006. On reconsideration, the Board affirmed the temporary total disability finding, rejecting the employer's arguments regarding evidence and jurisdiction. The Board also corrected a clerical error in the original findings regarding the date of injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.