Home/Case Law/SILVIA RAMOS vs. DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM HOLDINGS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

SILVIA RAMOS vs. DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM HOLDINGS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jan 13, 2014
ADJ3798914 (BAK 0153701) ADJ892347 (BAK 0153699) ADJ4538903 (BAK 0153700)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal and dismissed the applicant's petition to reopen. The applicant's petition was filed before any award of permanent disability was made, and therefore, it did not meet the criteria for "new and further disability" under Labor Code Section 5410. The Board emphasized that the applicant's injuries were not a progressive disease, so the employer could not reserve jurisdiction for future permanent disability evaluation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal and dismissed the applicant's petition to reopen. The applicant's petition was filed before any award of permanent disability was made, and therefore, it did not meet the criteria for "new and further disability" under Labor Code Section 5410. The Board emphasized that the applicant's injuries were not a progressive disease, so the employer could not reserve jurisdiction for future permanent disability evaluation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.