Home/Case Law/SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES

Filed: Jul 17, 2007
San Francisco
SFO 495194

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over the apportionment of permanent disability for Shirley Shaw's left shoulder and neck injury. The employer sought reconsideration of an award finding $34%$ permanent disability, arguing the judge erred by not apportioning $30%$ of the disability to a pre-existing condition as suggested by the Agreed Medical Examiner. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the case for further proceedings on apportionment, noting the defendant did not waive the issue and that the AME's apportionment lacked sufficient detail.

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over the apportionment of permanent disability for Shirley Shaw's left shoulder and neck injury. The employer sought reconsideration of an award finding $34%$ permanent disability, arguing the judge erred by not apportioning $30%$ of the disability to a pre-existing condition as suggested by the Agreed Medical Examiner. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the case for further proceedings on apportionment, noting the defendant did not waive the issue and that the AME's apportionment lacked sufficient detail.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES Case Analysis

SHIRLEY SHAW vs. SETON MEDICAL CENTER, Permissibly Self-Insured and Administered by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.