Home/Case Law/SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent)
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent)

Filed: Apr 30, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3237915 (LBO 0375567) ADJ2373677 (LBO 0388992)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves applicant Sheryl Willis's appeal regarding two worker's compensation claims. The Appeals Board affirmed the finding of a 1% permanent disability for a left knee injury. However, they rescinded the finding of no permanent disability for a psyche injury stemming from a 2005 assault. The Board remanded the psyche injury claim for further proceedings to develop the record on psychiatric permanent disability and apportionment, citing issues with the applicant's medical history disclosure. The applicant's credibility regarding past psychiatric treatment was a key factor in the decision.

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent) is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves applicant Sheryl Willis's appeal regarding two worker's compensation claims. The Appeals Board affirmed the finding of a 1% permanent disability for a left knee injury. However, they rescinded the finding of no permanent disability for a psyche injury stemming from a 2005 assault. The Board remanded the psyche injury claim for further proceedings to develop the record on psychiatric permanent disability and apportionment, citing issues with the applicant's medical history disclosure. The applicant's credibility regarding past psychiatric treatment was a key factor in the decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent) workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent) case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent) Case Analysis

SHERYL WILLIS vs. PINKERTON GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Permissibly Self-Insured, BROADSPIRE (Adjusting Agent) is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.