CompFox AI Summary
Defendants sought removal of an order denying their request for a trial setting and taking the matter off calendar, arguing for discovery closure by a prior mandatory settlement conference and a trial. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board recommended a mandatory settlement conference and that discovery be closed appropriately. The WCJ was also directed to consider the admissibility of a vocational rehabilitation report and potential sanctions related to applicant's counsel's conduct.
SHEREE MIZZI vs. DAL POGETTO AND CO., LLP, PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendants sought removal of an order denying their request for a trial setting and taking the matter off calendar, arguing for discovery closure by a prior mandatory settlement conference and a trial. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board recommended a mandatory settlement conference and that discovery be closed appropriately. The WCJ was also directed to consider the admissibility of a vocational rehabilitation report and potential sanctions related to applicant's counsel's conduct.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.