CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the applicant's contentions regarding apportionment of permanent disability and the denial of permanent and total disability. The Board found that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof for apportionment, as the medical expert's opinion lacked substantial evidence and detail. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to an unapportioned award of permanent and total disability. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine the award and attorney's fees.
SHEILA FRANK vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the applicant's contentions regarding apportionment of permanent disability and the denial of permanent and total disability. The Board found that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof for apportionment, as the medical expert's opinion lacked substantial evidence and detail. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to an unapportioned award of permanent and total disability. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine the award and attorney's fees.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.