CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration of the WCJ's decision. The Board rescinded the original findings due to procedural issues, including the WCJ's failure to properly frame the issues of permanent disability and apportionment, and the lack of a clear finding on the psyche injury. The case is returned to the trial level for reframing of issues, development of the record, and a decision on all outstanding matters, including the contested temporary disability award.
SHARON WATT LeBLANC vs. APRIA HEALTHCARE, AIG is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration of the WCJ's decision. The Board rescinded the original findings due to procedural issues, including the WCJ's failure to properly frame the issues of permanent disability and apportionment, and the lack of a clear finding on the psyche injury. The case is returned to the trial level for reframing of issues, development of the record, and a decision on all outstanding matters, including the contested temporary disability award.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.