CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed a prior order requiring the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) to reimburse Sutter Health. CIGA argued that the reimbursement claim, stemming from a stipulation with an insolvent insurer, was not a covered claim under Insurance Code section 1063.1. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report and recommendation, denying CIGA's reconsideration request. Therefore, CIGA remains obligated to reimburse Sutter Health as per the original stipulation.
SHARON SUNDMAN SCHULTZ vs. SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, SUTTER HEALTH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed a prior order requiring the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) to reimburse Sutter Health. CIGA argued that the reimbursement claim, stemming from a stipulation with an insolvent insurer, was not a "covered claim" under Insurance Code section 1063.1. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report and recommendation, denying CIGA's reconsideration request. Therefore, CIGA remains obligated to reimburse Sutter Health as per the original stipulation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.