Home/Case Law/SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filed: May 11, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ824062 (VNO 0395359) ADJ1729914 (VNO 0452072) ADJ385264 (VNO 0548716) ADJ4506449 (VNO 0548713)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves multiple injury claims for Sharon Sprague against Beverly Fabrics and Mikasa, primarily concerning back, hip, and fibromyalgia injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to address disputes over permanent disability ratings and apportionment of injuries. The WCAB rescinded prior findings, finding insufficient evidence for permanent total disability and the exact causation of fibromyalgia. The matter is remanded for further proceedings to develop the record on fibromyalgia causation, permanent disability, and apportionment.

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves multiple injury claims for Sharon Sprague against Beverly Fabrics and Mikasa, primarily concerning back, hip, and fibromyalgia injuries. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to address disputes over permanent disability ratings and apportionment of injuries. The WCAB rescinded prior findings, finding insufficient evidence for permanent total disability and the exact causation of fibromyalgia. The matter is remanded for further proceedings to develop the record on fibromyalgia causation, permanent disability, and apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Case Analysis

SHARON SPRAGUE vs. BEVERLY FABRICS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKASA, SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.