CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Kaiser Permanente's Petition for Reconsideration to amend a clerical error in the original Findings and Award. The original award found the applicant $100%$ permanently disabled due to a May 2, 2002 injury as a social worker. The amendment clarifies that Dr. Alban's apportionment is valid, attributing $80%$ of the lumbar spine disability to the date of injury. All other aspects of the original award remain affirmed.
Sharon Shinedling vs. Kaiser Permanente, Sedgwick Claims Management Services is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Kaiser Permanente's Petition for Reconsideration to amend a clerical error in the original Findings and Award. The original award found the applicant $100%$ permanently disabled due to a May 2, 2002 injury as a social worker. The amendment clarifies that Dr. Alban's apportionment is valid, attributing $80%$ of the lumbar spine disability to the date of injury. All other aspects of the original award remain affirmed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.