CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award, finding the defendant's petition had merit. The defendant argued the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion was not substantial evidence as it lacked specific commentary on temporary disability dates. The Board agreed, adopting the WCJ's recommendation to develop the record. Therefore, the previous Findings and Award were rescinded and the case returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision.
SHARON FRANK vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award, finding the defendant's petition had merit. The defendant argued the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion was not substantial evidence as it lacked specific commentary on temporary disability dates. The Board agreed, adopting the WCJ's recommendation to develop the record. Therefore, the previous Findings and Award were rescinded and the case returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.