CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend the date from which vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) was awarded. The Board found the applicant entitled to VRMA at the temporary disability rate from January 28, 2005, due to the defendant's breach of its obligation to provide timely notice of vocational rehabilitation eligibility. This date was established by calculating ten days after the defendant's presumed receipt of a physician's report indicating eligibility, accounting for mailing time.
SHARON DUNNIGAN vs. CITY OF INGLEWOOD is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend the date from which vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) was awarded. The Board found the applicant entitled to VRMA at the temporary disability rate from January 28, 2005, due to the defendant's breach of its obligation to provide timely notice of vocational rehabilitation eligibility. This date was established by calculating ten days after the defendant's presumed receipt of a physician's report indicating eligibility, accounting for mailing time.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.