CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinded the WCJ's April 16, 2019 Finding and Order, and returned the matter for further proceedings. Removal was granted because the applicant demonstrated potential irreparable harm and lack of due process. The WCJ's order for a replacement QME panel lacked supporting admitted evidence, violating the principle that decisions must be based on the evidentiary record. Therefore, the Appeals Board found the absence of admitted evidence regarding discovery issues and the need for a replacement panel prevented a fair and supported decision.
SHAKEH DARZIAN vs. GMZ PHARMACY, INC., EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinded the WCJ's April 16, 2019 Finding and Order, and returned the matter for further proceedings. Removal was granted because the applicant demonstrated potential irreparable harm and lack of due process. The WCJ's order for a replacement QME panel lacked supporting admitted evidence, violating the principle that decisions must be based on the evidentiary record. Therefore, the Appeals Board found the absence of admitted evidence regarding discovery issues and the need for a replacement panel prevented a fair and supported decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.