Home/Case Law/SEYED NAVID MOUSAVIRAD vs. LAFAYETTE PARK HOTEL AND SPA, LIBERTY MUTUAL
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SEYED NAVID MOUSAVIRAD vs. LAFAYETTE PARK HOTEL AND SPA, LIBERTY MUTUAL

Filed: Jan 30, 2020
Oakland
ADJ10296423

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision finding no violation of Labor Code section 132a. The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination because there was no evidence the employer knew about a work-related injury or the intent to file a claim. The applicant was on medical leave for an unrelated condition and terminated after exhausting that leave. The Board clarified that the applicant takes nothing on his claim, rather than it being dismissed on procedural grounds.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original decision finding no violation of Labor Code section 132a. The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination because there was no evidence the employer knew about a work-related injury or the intent to file a claim. The applicant was on medical leave for an unrelated condition and terminated after exhausting that leave. The Board clarified that the applicant takes nothing on his claim, rather than it being dismissed on procedural grounds.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SEYED NAVID MOUSAVIRAD vs. LAFAYETTE PARK HOTEL AND SPA, LIBERTY MUTUAL (2020) – Oakland | CompFox