Home/Case Law/SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES

Filed: Feb 18, 2010
ADJ620656 (LAO 0765628) ADJ515169 (LAO 0765629)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to CIGA, rescinding the WCJ's order that applicant's average weekly earnings were $900.00, which would have increased indemnity payments. The Board found the evidence insufficient to justify setting aside the parties' 2000 stipulation of $754.47 in weekly earnings, citing a lack of good cause such as mutual mistake. The case is remanded to the trial level for further development of the record regarding the accuracy of the stipulated earnings and whether there is good cause to overturn it. The check stubs submitted by the applicant raise a question, necessitating further proceedings to fully adjudicate the issue.

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to CIGA, rescinding the WCJ's order that applicant's average weekly earnings were $900.00, which would have increased indemnity payments. The Board found the evidence insufficient to justify setting aside the parties' 2000 stipulation of $754.47 in weekly earnings, citing a lack of good cause such as mutual mistake. The case is remanded to the trial level for further development of the record regarding the accuracy of the stipulated earnings and whether there is good cause to overturn it. The check stubs submitted by the applicant raise a question, necessitating further proceedings to fully adjudicate the issue.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES Case Analysis

SERGIO CHAIREZ vs. CHEROKEE BINDERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, by INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.