Home/Case Law/Seiber v. Reeves Logging
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Seiber v. Reeves Logging

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This appeal concerns the Second Injury Fund's obligation to pay workers’ compensation benefits when an employer lacked liability insurance. James Russell Seiber, an employee of Reeves Logging, sustained a second work-related injury in 2007, leaving him permanently and totally disabled, following a prior injury in 2005. Reeves Logging, owned by Leon Reeves, did not have workers’ compensation insurance at the time of Seiber’s second injury, despite having previously elected coverage and failing to file a withdrawal form. The trial court initially awarded Seiber benefits, allocating 85% liability to the Second Injury Fund. However, this Court reversed that decision, ruling that the Second Injury Fund is not liable because the employer was not 'properly insured' under Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a)(2) when the employee was injured.

Seiber v. Reeves Logging is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This appeal concerns the Second Injury Fund's obligation to pay workers’ compensation benefits when an employer lacked liability insurance. James Russell Seiber, an employee of Reeves Logging, sustained a second work-related injury in 2007, leaving him permanently and totally disabled, following a prior injury in 2005. Reeves Logging, owned by Leon Reeves, did not have workers’ compensation insurance at the time of Seiber’s second injury, despite having previously elected coverage and failing to file a withdrawal form. The trial court initially awarded Seiber benefits, allocating 85% liability to the Second Injury Fund. However, this Court reversed that decision, ruling that the Second Injury Fund is not liable because the employer was not 'properly insured' under Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a)(2) when the employee was injured.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Seiber v. Reeves Logging workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Seiber v. Reeves Logging case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Seiber v. Reeves Logging Case Analysis

Seiber v. Reeves Logging is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.