Security Insurance Co. v. Nasser

This is a workers' compensation case on remand from the Supreme Court, concerning Izzat Nasser, a worker assaulted on the job by a third party, Victor Daryoush. The central legal question revolves around whether Nasser's injury was sustained in the course of his employment, specifically addressing the 'personal-animosity' exception under the Workers’ Compensation Act. The Supreme Court previously ruled the exception inapplicable, citing that the assault was incidental to Nasser's employment duties and Daryoush's mental incapacity to form rational intent. This court now reviews factual sufficiency and other points raised on remand. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that the injury occurred in the course of employment and that Daryoush lacked rational intent at the time of the assault.

Security Insurance Co. v. Nasser is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.