CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a petition for reconsideration by defendant Wausau regarding an arbitrator's findings that applicant sustained industrial injury to his pulmonary system and upper extremities during a cumulative period. Wausau argued the claim was time-barred and that liability for upper extremity injury was improper. The Board denied Wausau's petition, finding Wausau failed to meet its burden of proof on the statute of limitations defense. The Board also determined that applicant properly amended his claim for upper extremities and that apportionment of liability based on days worked was appropriate.
SEAN HARRIS vs. COAST CRANE COMPANY, EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, THUNDER MACHINE WORKS, AIX INSURANCE COMPANY, AEROTEK, ALLEGIS GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a petition for reconsideration by defendant Wausau regarding an arbitrator's findings that applicant sustained industrial injury to his pulmonary system and upper extremities during a cumulative period. Wausau argued the claim was time-barred and that liability for upper extremity injury was improper. The Board denied Wausau's petition, finding Wausau failed to meet its burden of proof on the statute of limitations defense. The Board also determined that applicant properly amended his claim for upper extremities and that apportionment of liability based on days worked was appropriate.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.