Home/Case Law/SCOTT HAMPTON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SCOTT HAMPTON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Filed: Sep 05, 2017
Salinas
ADJ10086397

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board agreed that the applicant sustained a compensable psychiatric injury, despite the defendant arguing it stemmed from good faith personnel actions. While acknowledging that employer investigations can constitute personnel actions, the Board found no evidence that such actions substantially caused the applicant's injury. Instead, medical evaluations indicated the injury was caused by co-worker ostracization, which is not a personnel action.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board agreed that the applicant sustained a compensable psychiatric injury, despite the defendant arguing it stemmed from good faith personnel actions. While acknowledging that employer investigations can constitute personnel actions, the Board found no evidence that such actions substantially caused the applicant's injury. Instead, medical evaluations indicated the injury was caused by co-worker ostracization, which is not a personnel action.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SCOTT HAMPTON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA (2017) – Salinas | CompFox