CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Santiago Zepeda's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that Zepeda did not sustain an industrial injury, giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determination. Zepeda's inconsistent testimony regarding past injuries and the WCJ's finding of his lack of credibility undermined his claim. Furthermore, the primary treating physician's reports were deemed not substantial evidence due to inadequate medical histories.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Santiago Zepeda's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that Zepeda did not sustain an industrial injury, giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determination. Zepeda's inconsistent testimony regarding past injuries and the WCJ's finding of his lack of credibility undermined his claim. Furthermore, the primary treating physician's reports were deemed not substantial evidence due to inadequate medical histories.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.