CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinding the WCJ's order to reopen discovery and admit new vocational expert reports. The Board found the WCJ erred by allowing further discovery beyond the admission of a specific prior report by Dr. Monguio. The case is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to consider Dr. Monguio's December 29, 2008 report regarding apportionment and permanent disability, but not to re-examine all issues or introduce new evidence.
SANTIAGO CARRANZA vs. SAFEGUARD ROOFING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, APPLIED RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinding the WCJ's order to reopen discovery and admit new vocational expert reports. The Board found the WCJ erred by allowing further discovery beyond the admission of a specific prior report by Dr. Monguio. The case is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to consider Dr. Monguio's December 29, 2008 report regarding apportionment and permanent disability, but not to re-examine all issues or introduce new evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.