CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final order. The Board determined the WCJ's decision only addressed an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary issue, not a substantive right or liability. Additionally, the petition for removal was denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and removal were dismissed.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final order. The Board determined the WCJ's decision only addressed an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary issue, not a substantive right or liability. Additionally, the petition for removal was denied, as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and removal were dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.