Home/Case Law/SANDEFUR, JAMES vs. SAUGUS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN ASSOCIATES
Regular DecisionRemoval and Disqualification

SANDEFUR, JAMES vs. SAUGUS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN ASSOCIATES

Filed: Oct 23, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ11451888

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's petition for removal and disqualification of the administrative law judge (WCJ). Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon showing substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the applicant failed to demonstrate. Furthermore, the petition for disqualification lacked specific factual allegations under penalty of perjury, rendering it insufficient to warrant disqualification of the WCJ. Therefore, the WCAB concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy and denied both aspects of the petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's petition for removal and disqualification of the administrative law judge (WCJ). Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon showing substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the applicant failed to demonstrate. Furthermore, the petition for disqualification lacked specific factual allegations under penalty of perjury, rendering it insufficient to warrant disqualification of the WCJ. Therefore, the WCAB concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy and denied both aspects of the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SANDEFUR, JAMES vs. SAUGUS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN ASSOCIATES (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox