Home/Case Law/SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK

Filed: Oct 08, 2012
Anaheim
ADJ7113572

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision regarding Sammie Rogers' claim. The WCAB affirmed the original decision but amended it to clarify the attorney's fee structure for a life pension. The amendment specifies that the 15% attorney fee will be commuted from the present value of the life pension, calculated using the artificial far end of the applicant's life expectancy. Jurisdiction is reserved regarding the amount of the life pension until further order.

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision regarding Sammie Rogers' claim. The WCAB affirmed the original decision but amended it to clarify the attorney's fee structure for a life pension. The amendment specifies that the 15% attorney fee will be commuted from the present value of the life pension, calculated using the artificial far end of the applicant's life expectancy. Jurisdiction is reserved regarding the amount of the life pension until further order.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK Case Analysis

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SAMMIE ROGERS vs. BUFFALO BILLS, ATLANTA FALCONS, SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, et al.; TRAVELERS; SEDGWICK (2012) – Anaheim | CompFox | CompFox