CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied defendant Scripps Health's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's decision to deny a compel order for a QME examination. Scripps Health sought to compel an examination by Dr. Strauser regarding applicant Samantha Howe's pain management treatment. The Board ruled that Scripps Health's objection to the pain management treatment must be addressed through utilization review, not a QME evaluation, citing the Sandhagen Supreme Court decision. Therefore, Scripps Health is barred from using Labor Code section 4062 to dispute treatment recommendations for pain management.
SAMANTHA HOWE vs. SCRIPPS HEALTH, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied defendant Scripps Health's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's decision to deny a compel order for a QME examination. Scripps Health sought to compel an examination by Dr. Strauser regarding applicant Samantha Howe's pain management treatment. The Board ruled that Scripps Health's objection to the pain management treatment must be addressed through utilization review, not a QME evaluation, citing the Sandhagen Supreme Court decision. Therefore, Scripps Health is barred from using Labor Code section 4062 to dispute treatment recommendations for pain management.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.