CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Safeway's Petition for Removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not warranted in this case. The Board determined that Safeway failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied. Furthermore, the Board concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final decision adverse to Safeway ultimately issues. The WCJ's report also noted Safeway's procedural violation by attaching previously filed deposition transcripts.
SAMANTHA BUTLER vs. SAFEWAY, ALBERTSONS HOLDINGS is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Safeway's Petition for Removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not warranted in this case. The Board determined that Safeway failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied. Furthermore, the Board concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final decision adverse to Safeway ultimately issues. The WCJ's report also noted Safeway's procedural violation by attaching previously filed deposition transcripts.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.