Home/Case Law/SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ vs. WE'RE INNOVATIVE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ vs. WE'RE INNOVATIVE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jan 03, 2008
San Francisco
SDO 0322754

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release agreement. While the petition had procedural defects like lack of verification and proof of service, the Board did not dismiss it on these grounds, finding them non-jurisdictional or waived. Ultimately, the reconsideration was denied on the merits because the Compromise and Release was deemed adequate, reflecting a reasonable resolution of conflicting medical opinions regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release agreement. While the petition had procedural defects like lack of verification and proof of service, the Board did not dismiss it on these grounds, finding them non-jurisdictional or waived. Ultimately, the reconsideration was denied on the merits because the Compromise and Release was deemed adequate, reflecting a reasonable resolution of conflicting medical opinions regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ vs. WE'RE INNOVATIVE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox