CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's order setting a lien trial was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision on substantive rights. The Board found the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm, especially since their prior counsel missed two lien conferences. Therefore, reconsideration was unavailable, and removal was not warranted.
SACHIKO BUNUAN vs. GALLOWAY'S PHARMACY, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's order setting a lien trial was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision on substantive rights. The Board found the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm, especially since their prior counsel missed two lien conferences. Therefore, reconsideration was unavailable, and removal was not warranted.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.