Home/Case Law/RUDY FLORES vs. HYATT WEST HOLLYWOOD, BROADSPIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RUDY FLORES vs. HYATT WEST HOLLYWOOD, BROADSPIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 11, 2010
ADJ614580 (VNO 0484100)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) vacated a prior award concerning Cedars-Sinai's lien for applicant's treatment. The Board denied Cedars-Sinai's petition for reconsideration, finding the WCJ's reasoning regarding non-industrial treatment sound. However, the WCAB granted the defendant's petition to allow further briefing on the WCAB's jurisdiction over the medical fee dispute, citing Labor Code section 5304 and existing contracts. The core issue is whether contractual agreements preclude WCAB jurisdiction over the payment dispute between the employer and the medical provider.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) vacated a prior award concerning Cedars-Sinai's lien for applicant's treatment. The Board denied Cedars-Sinai's petition for reconsideration, finding the WCJ's reasoning regarding non-industrial treatment sound. However, the WCAB granted the defendant's petition to allow further briefing on the WCAB's jurisdiction over the medical fee dispute, citing Labor Code section 5304 and existing contracts. The core issue is whether contractual agreements preclude WCAB jurisdiction over the payment dispute between the employer and the medical provider.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.