Home/Case Law/RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC.

Filed: Mar 28, 2009
SBR 0332538

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior order, and returned the case for further proceedings on the reasonableness of Premier Outpatient Surgery Center's (POSC) $$16,578.00$ lien claim for surgical services. While POSC was properly licensed as a surgical clinic and did not require a fictitious-name permit, the Appeals Board found the record insufficient to establish the reasonableness of the charged fee, noting a significant disparity between the billed amount and what was paid based on Medicare rates. The Board also rescinded the award of attorney's fees to POSC's counsel, finding no basis for such an award under Labor Code sections 5811 or 5813.

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior order, and returned the case for further proceedings on the reasonableness of Premier Outpatient Surgery Center's (POSC) $$16,578.00$ lien claim for surgical services. While POSC was properly licensed as a surgical clinic and did not require a fictitious-name permit, the Appeals Board found the record insufficient to establish the reasonableness of the charged fee, noting a significant disparity between the billed amount and what was paid based on Medicare rates. The Board also rescinded the award of attorney's fees to POSC's counsel, finding no basis for such an award under Labor Code sections 5811 or 5813.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC. workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC. case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC. Case Analysis

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.