CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) finding that the applicant was not credible and did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). The ALJ's report, which the Board adopted, emphasized the applicant's lack of credibility, failure to disclose pre-existing conditions, and the credibility of defense witnesses and medical evidence. The Board gave great weight to the ALJ's credibility findings.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) finding that the applicant was not credible and did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). The ALJ's report, which the Board adopted, emphasized the applicant's lack of credibility, failure to disclose pre-existing conditions, and the credibility of defense witnesses and medical evidence. The Board gave great weight to the ALJ's credibility findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.