Home/Case Law/RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

Filed: Apr 22, 2018
Pomona
ADJ10486755

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Ruben Aquino's Petition for Reconsideration as premature because his allegations of fraud and new evidence lacked supporting testimony or admitted evidence. The Board found that the original service of the Compromise and Release order was defective, making Aquino's petition timely for the purpose of review. However, since no evidence was presented regarding his claims, the Board returned the matter to the trial level. The WCJ is instructed to schedule a hearing for parties to present evidence, after which either party may file a new petition for reconsideration.

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a workers' compensation case decided in Pomona. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Pomona.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Ruben Aquino's Petition for Reconsideration as premature because his allegations of fraud and new evidence lacked supporting testimony or admitted evidence. The Board found that the original service of the Compromise and Release order was defective, making Aquino's petition timely for the purpose of review. However, since no evidence was presented regarding his claims, the Board returned the matter to the trial level. The WCJ is instructed to schedule a hearing for parties to present evidence, after which either party may file a new petition for reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES workers compensation case in Pomona. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES case law summary from Pomona. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES Case Analysis

RUBEN AQUINO vs. MISSION PAVING, CLARENDON INSURANCE F/K/A SUSSEX INSURANCE, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, REDWOOD FIRE \& CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Pomona. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.