Home/Case Law/RUANO-SANDOVAL, vs. GLACIER WATER SERVICES, INC.; CRUM AND FORSTER,
Regular DecisionReconsideration

RUANO-SANDOVAL, vs. GLACIER WATER SERVICES, INC.; CRUM AND FORSTER,

Filed: May 06, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ2465961 (VNO 0505993) ADJ1445462 (VNO 0538387)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a second Petition for Reconsideration filed by the applicant's attorney challenging the Appeals Board's prior denial of reconsideration. The Board dismissed the petition because California law prohibits successive reconsideration petitions; the applicant should have sought a writ of review. Additionally, the current petition failed to actually request reconsideration, instead merely explaining service errors. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a second Petition for Reconsideration filed by the applicant's attorney challenging the Appeals Board's prior denial of reconsideration. The Board dismissed the petition because California law prohibits successive reconsideration petitions; the applicant should have sought a writ of review. Additionally, the current petition failed to actually request reconsideration, instead merely explaining service errors. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

RUANO-SANDOVAL, vs. GLACIER WATER SERVICES, INC.; CRUM AND FORSTER, (2013) – San Francisco | CompFox