Home/Case Law/Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This Memorandum Opinion addresses claims of sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge brought by sisters Beverly Ross and Sheila Stoudenmire against their employer, Double Diamond, Inc., and manager Larry Womack, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court found that Plaintiff Ross was subjected to a severe and pervasive hostile work environment, detailing numerous unwelcome sexual advances, physical touching, and humiliating incidents by Womack and other salesmen. While Plaintiff Stoudenmire's hostile work environment claim was denied, the Court determined that both plaintiffs were victims of retaliatory discharge after complaining about the harassment. Consequently, the Court awarded Ross and Stoudenmire back pay, ordered Double Diamond, Inc. to implement a comprehensive anti-discrimination system, and granted attorneys' fees to the plaintiffs, affirming employer liability for Womack's supervisory actions.

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, N.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, N.D. Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Memorandum Opinion addresses claims of sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge brought by sisters Beverly Ross and Sheila Stoudenmire against their employer, Double Diamond, Inc., and manager Larry Womack, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court found that Plaintiff Ross was subjected to a severe and pervasive hostile work environment, detailing numerous unwelcome sexual advances, physical touching, and humiliating incidents by Womack and other salesmen. While Plaintiff Stoudenmire's hostile work environment claim was denied, the Court determined that both plaintiffs were victims of retaliatory discharge after complaining about the harassment. Consequently, the Court awarded Ross and Stoudenmire back pay, ordered Double Diamond, Inc. to implement a comprehensive anti-discrimination system, and granted attorneys' fees to the plaintiffs, affirming employer liability for Womack's supervisory actions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc. workers compensation case in District Court, N.D. Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc. case law summary from District Court, N.D. Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc. Case Analysis

Ross v. Double Diamond, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, N.D. Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.